NG Model - 1:400 February 2023 Release "Hints"

No clue why NG is reluctant to do these popular US Airbus narrowbody aircraft. Perhaps they are doing all the A321s first then all the A319s and A320s? I don't really understand their logic here, questionable at best.
I'm confused as well. Their selection process is quite bizarre, and we haven't gotten a single A319 or A320 produced for a US carrier despite these molds being introduced last summer. I'm not sure if they're trying to get through all the A321s first but the A321 has definitely been a big focus for them. I wonder if their ability to manufacture these two molds has been limited somehow? But I'm not sure.
Count on Panda Models to make some US carriers, next on their list is the US Airways A320 N106US. I've already have the Jetblue A320 N794JB and the United A319 N876UA.
 
If NG makes an Evo Blue A320 I’ll be sure to buy it. That’s the big US narrowbody release we’re missing right now. GJ hasn’t done it yet, Panda hasn’t sniffed the idea, and AC made one with poor colors.
I'm really hoping we get that soon as well. That would be an absolute slam dunk.

I'm a bit worried that we might end up seeing a regular Globe livery A320 or even the Friend Ship retro livery first since NG has been making some strange release decisions. We got the revised '787 style' globe livery for the first United 737-9, but technically the current livery is Evo Blue. We got the Canyon Yellow and Canyon Blue retro Southwest 737-8s instead of the normal Heart livery. I feel like this will probably be the case for the Alaska 737-9 (the Orca or Seattle Kraken liveries being released first). I understand that special liveries are valuable, but I believe that releasing aircraft in their standard and most current liveries should be prioritized first.

74780_1548646650.jpg
 
Last edited:
Amazing, looks like they nailed the longer exhausts as well. Can't wait to see the electroplated chrome!
Yes they’ve faithfully detailed the longer exhaust on the #2, as in the photo they showed before. However the #1 and #3 have the shorter exhausts, which is interesting (and again correctly replicated in their artwork referenced from that same photo). I only just noticed that. So we have VR-HHK in 1977-1980 condition - they need to update their description in the database! Which is fine by me, this is more prototypical as she didn’t stay in 1975 condition for that long (a year and a half or thereabouts).

However I wonder how long the #2 remained with the longer exhaust in combination with the modified shorter types on the #1 and #3? They were all certainly modified by the early 1980s.
 
Last edited:
Just to add to the above. It’s looking more and more likely that the long #2 exhaust exhaust arrangement in combination with modded short #1 & #3 is a one-off situation which was very short-lived, and would not have been the operating arrangement on -HHK for very long. Indeed, the radome in that single reference picture is also not matching as a portion of the black cockpit anti-glare is missing on it. I don’t think this is shown on the artwork. The aircraft appears to have been caught in a temporary condition.

All the artwork needs is a revision to the #2, making it a short exhaust to match the other 2 engines, so it would correctly reflect the prototypical condition for -HHK during the period this livery style was worn. Otherwise, it’s an oddment release.

Original NG ref. pic attached, from which artwork is derived, with 2 others; one in 1977 clearly showing full matching radome (compare to NG ref. pic), can’t confirm exhaust situation here but strongly suspect all are matching, shorter exhausts; then another taken in Perth in 1980, showing same livery style, definitely confirming matching short exhausts on all 3 engines by this time:
 

Attachments

  • BADE6F14-0FC0-4518-8934-B32BE164F816.png
    BADE6F14-0FC0-4518-8934-B32BE164F816.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 39
  • 9C35DEF1-EFAB-4385-95C6-8E6974EC6388.jpeg
    9C35DEF1-EFAB-4385-95C6-8E6974EC6388.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 24
  • 3DA67FEB-9FC0-49BB-8DB2-5BDF115E99C5.jpeg
    3DA67FEB-9FC0-49BB-8DB2-5BDF115E99C5.jpeg
    87.9 KB · Views: 21
  • 0DEE568A-9EC1-4707-A592-6F8BC4AEF586.jpeg
    0DEE568A-9EC1-4707-A592-6F8BC4AEF586.jpeg
    139.8 KB · Views: 23
By 1980, HHK had already been through a paintshop (now bare around #2). The position of the Swire logo at that time is interesting.
Oh yes, the light is reflecting off the bare metal area around the #2, and the Swire logo has indeed been moved again, up behind the cockpit. Then it moved up in front of the ‘Cathay Pacific’ titles for a 3rd time after this! This livery is a pain because it doesn’t seem to stay the same for 5 minutes! Always something slightly different going on.
 
Oh yes, the light is reflecting off the bare metal area around the #2, and the Swire logo has indeed been moved again, up behind the cockpit. Then it moved up in front of the ‘Cathay Pacific’ titles for a 3rd time after this! This livery is a pain because it doesn’t seem to stay the same for 5 minutes! Always something slightly different going on.

I'd blame it on much shorter time frames between longer lasting shop visits - they had the time to touch up the livery.:unsure::LOL:
And air frame lacquers back then weren't as durable as they are today. A single flight through a hail cloud could be enough the peel the colors from the radome. Durability (and ray permeability) was the major reason for why most simply operated their radomes in the well known black rubber coating.
 
I'd blame it on much shorter time frames between longer lasting shop visits - they had the time to touch up the livery.:unsure::LOL:
And air frame lacquers back then weren't as durable as they are today. A single flight through a hail cloud could be enough the peel the colors from the radome. Durability (and ray permeability) was the major reason for why most simply operated their radomes in the well known black rubber coating.
A good reminder that paint technology has come a long way since the 1970s - that era is quite a way back in time now that we're marching through the 2020s 😮
 
Looks like the Cathay's delayed indefinitely
This is actually something I REALLY like with NG. There often is a notable relation between artwork "nitpicks" and the final product. Probably meaning they still care to get the stuff done right after receiving feedback.
 
This is actually something I REALLY like with NG. There often is a notable relation between artwork "nitpicks" and the final product. Probably meaning they still care to get the stuff done right after receiving feedback.
Never mind, it's up!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230410_182702_Instagram.jpg
    Screenshot_20230410_182702_Instagram.jpg
    204.5 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
Never mind, it's up!
No change with the artwork on the box then, looks like they’re sticking to that very short-lived/temporary configuration with modified short exhausts on #1 & #3, and long exhaust on the #2. If I had some spare short exhaust bits I’d yank that off and replace it to make it prototypical. Attractive box art as per usual though!
 
No change with the artwork on the box then, looks like they’re sticking to that very short-lived/temporary configuration with modified short exhausts on #1 & #3, and long exhaust on the #2. If I had some spare short exhaust bits I’d yank that off and replace it to make it prototypical. Attractive box art as per usual though!
Well, that does give NG one extra CX Tristar to make. The more, the merrier! I'm sure we'll see some longer-lived schemes down the line.
 
Well, that does give NG one extra CX Tristar to make. The more, the merrier! I'm sure we'll see some longer-lived schemes down the line.
I’m still looking forward to this one. It fits the criteria of the late 1970s. Definitely, I’d love to see a version with the later style Swire flag ahead of ‘Cathay Pacific’ titles with the Union Jack & ‘Super TriStar’ titles on #2, minus black radome/glare shield, and unpainted #2 exhaust area (as per VR-HHY in attached photo). That’s never been done and would cover the mid-1980s, circa 1983-1986. The CX ‘lettuce’ scheme seemed to change every 5 mins, with one detail or other being different, on the TriStar at least! Perhaps the version minus the Union Jack and ‘Super TriStar’ titles may have been the longest?

I don’t know how likely it’ll be now for one in the ‘1975 in-service c/s’ with ‘Lockheed L-1011’ etc., that’s the version Phantom was really hoping for here. Covering so many subtle variants of the livery might not be viable. Usually we get a main version for ‘70s-‘80s then another for ‘80s-‘90s, but perhaps NG will still plug more gaps.
 

Attachments

  • D4E63CE3-1070-4041-8D28-B8DA9A5714A7.jpeg
    D4E63CE3-1070-4041-8D28-B8DA9A5714A7.jpeg
    359.1 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:
Finally! The chrome looks fabulous.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230428_003739_Instagram.jpg
    Screenshot_20230428_003739_Instagram.jpg
    142.2 KB · Views: 25
  • Screenshot_20230428_005314_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20230428_005314_Gallery.jpg
    74.3 KB · Views: 23
  • Screenshot_20230428_005316_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20230428_005316_Gallery.jpg
    87 KB · Views: 22
  • Screenshot_20230428_005319_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20230428_005319_Gallery.jpg
    106.8 KB · Views: 22
  • Screenshot_20230428_005321_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20230428_005321_Gallery.jpg
    100.5 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Top