Oh, in that case, just click the check mark once to bring up the selector, then click the checkmark in the popup and it will be unselected.To clarify, this is regarding my own collection. Not a general thing to delete a model from the data base.
I do have one question. Will there eventually be a field for the number of units produced for each model (if known)?
Yes, I see that now. Hopefully we can get some production numbers after 2008.That already exists.
And just to note for any photos submitted: if they are for 400 scale brands that Rich has not gotten to yet, I will leave them pending until he has gone through them. Then we will approve any that are still missing photos. So if you don't see your photos approved in the next few hours, do not worry. They are still being saved and we will get to them soon enough. Thank you for your contributions!
View attachment 30786
It seems that Waffle has taken down the 1/400 and 1/200 parts of DiMa because of this new database. Disappointing that this happened as I quite liked looking through that database and the images that it had.
Waffle’s a jokeView attachment 30786
It seems that Waffle has taken down the 1/400 and 1/200 parts of DiMa because of this new database. Disappointing that this happened as I quite liked looking through that database and the images that it had.
He still has and will use the database, he's just not letting people see it. It is just a big FY to all collectors because Waffle is WaffleThat's a bit of a weird move by waffle, I just don't understand why remove 1/400 and 1/200 entirely. And didn't waffle used the database to show what models they have for sale?
Dam, the more logical move would have been to improve the database not just close, especially fix the phone issues the site hasHe still has and will use the database, he's just not letting people see it. It is just a big FY to all collectors because Waffle is Waffle
The source of MADb isn't entirely made up of DIMA. If it were the dbs would be the same and they aren't. Also if it is an Aeroclassics or Panda Models or something more unusual added over the past 6 years then I was the one who added it in the first place. The original DAc data was sourced from a wide variety of places - for example I added almost all the thousands of 600 scale records myself too.It's funny when someone refuses to update their website/product to modern standards and points fingers at whoever does. Although I can understand that Waffle is frustrated that years of manually added models are copy pasted somewhere else.