That's rough. Were these models on the HJLY Wings mould?My Delta A321 Thank You Livery had loose wings and my American A321 Stand Up To Cancer, the nose gear came off.
I think they might be.. I had 3 A321s... American, Delta, and Spirit, and all 3 had the left wing loose in the cradle.That's rough. Were these models on the HJLY Wings mould?
I'm going to say yes, since these were earlier releases.That's rough. Were these models on the HJLY Wings mould?
They were and that was when NG suddenly had QC issues with the 321. They experimented with changing packaging and whatnot and withdrew the aircraft line shortly after (update: most likely due to developing the new mould set announced this year).That's rough. Were these models on the HJLY Wings mould?
As I recall it was mainly a single release that had issues. The HYJLwings A321 as a mould is fine and there aren't outstanding QC issues with it - I should know I have 26 of them.They were and that was when NG suddenly had QC issues with the 321. They experimented with changing packaging and whatnot and completely withdrew the aircraft line shortly after.
Fair point. Back then we could only imagine that QC was responsible for it, but looking back it makes sense. The issues were prominent in two batches (June and July) and got much better in the September batch containing the Thank You.As I recall it was mainly a single release that had issues. The HYJLwings A321 as a mould is fine and there aren't outstanding QC issues with it - I should know I have 26 of them.
This sort of language 'completely withdrew the aircraft line shortly after' is misleading and a little sensational. What actually happenned was NG produced their own line of A320 family aircraft and that included an A321. They did so to align the 321 with the 319 and 320 which HYJL didn't have. It is possible QC issues played a part in the decision but they weren't the primary driver and the aircraft line wasn't withdrawn. HYJLwings are still using the mould and it is made still in the NG factory.
Thanks for the information, it's good to see this clarified.As I recall it was mainly a single release that had issues. The HYJLwings A321 as a mould is fine and there aren't outstanding QC issues with it - I should know I have 26 of them.
This sort of language 'completely withdrew the aircraft line shortly after' is misleading and a little sensational. What actually happenned was NG produced their own line of A320 family aircraft and that included an A321. They did so to align the 321 with the 319 and 320 which HYJL didn't have. It is possible QC issues played a part in the decision but they weren't the primary driver and the aircraft line wasn't withdrawn. HYJLwings are still using the mould and it is made still in the NG factory.
I remember when NG first unveiled the 777, they were very active in terms of perfecting the mould before it goes to actual production. They communicated well with me after I sent some elements that could be improved (wing marking details, etc). They sent me modified drawings as follow-ups and I remember that it was quite impressive. They posted an updated set of wings on their socials as well after receiving feedback from multiple sources and customers.What I do like about NG versus other brands, is their attempts to make amends when QC issues rear their ugly head. Thinking back to 2018 when those first 757 releases appeared and I pointed out the wrong engine type on one of them, not only did they take that on board, they created a Rolls Royce RB-211-535C tooling for it, reissued the item and IIRC offered replacement engines to those who had already purchased the incorrect edition. Other examples of this attention to detail and professionalism can be highlighted too.
On the other hand, blatant production errors like the Aeroclassics Britannia 737 paint tone faux pass, or the Gemini Jets Loganair Saab 340 with Tonka wheels or its Aer Lingus ATR-72 with its 'angry eyes' cockpit detailing are forced out onto the market with a couldn't care less attitude.
That IMHO is the difference, and yes models will always be subject to the dark, inertial forces of bad shipping.
Yes, it would. If they did, the whole 1:400 community would be a whole lot happier. Shame it is unrealistic though.It would be nice if all of the manufacturers would seriously listen to the collectors, but that will probably never happen.
I think they were, I know that my 3 A321's that had issues were.That's rough. Were these models on the HJLY Wings mould?
Yeah, my NG Qantasfreight A321 and CX A321neos were both affectedI think they were, I know that my 3 A321's that had issues were.
Yes, I can say there's nothing wrong with the mould or the models, just the loose wings which were a quick and easy fix, no paint chips or scratches.As I recall it was mainly a single release that had issues. The HYJLwings A321 as a mould is fine and there aren't outstanding QC issues with it - I should know I have 26 of them.
This sort of language 'completely withdrew the aircraft line shortly after' is misleading and a little sensational. What actually happenned was NG produced their own line of A320 family aircraft and that included an A321. They did so to align the 321 with the 319 and 320 which HYJL didn't have. It is possible QC issues played a part in the decision but they weren't the primary driver and the aircraft line wasn't withdrawn. HYJLwings are still using the mould and it is made still in the NG factory.