Does G-BDXI have the correct reg, underwing ?Wow, those are simply gorgeous. Your retailer have a website?!
Nope - it's G-ADXI underwingDoes G-BDXI have the correct reg, underwing ?
Although the racoon mask makes it difficult to spot in a comparison with the NG version, you are correct. It should be a tad lower. I did notice that the nose gear appears to be a touch higher than NG*a - perhaps that might be the issue What do you guys think?AV400 printing the cockpit too high on some of their 787s. Need to bring it down and it might be equal or even better then NG’s
Happy birthday!For my birthday 2 days ago i got an GJ Alaska Airlines B737-900ER in the OneWorld Colo(u)rs.
I should note that i do have 2 Dragon Wings 747's (An Ansett Australia, and JALWays) On order from waffle.
That's an Angry-11.the cockpit printing looks really off.
That thing looks super mad about existing.Two new arrivals from yesterday!
Malaysia Airlines A380 (9M-MNE), AV400. Sadly, this one came with a chip on the starboard winglet.
View attachment 21934View attachment 21935View attachment 21936
Martinair MD-11 (PH-MCP), JC Wings. I have a few things to say.
View attachment 21937View attachment 21938
While a cradle mould doesn't bother me a lot, the landing gear appears too short, or the gear doors are too large. On top of it, being JC Wings fashion, the cockpit printing looks really off.
View attachment 21939View attachment 21940
Same for me and the JC KLM ATR42 (and ATR72 they showed on Instagram), just bad cockpit windows again and again even though it's one of the most important aspects of a diecast model.That MD-11 was a great release, but sadly ruined by the too short nose gear, weird nose gear doors and that terrible cockpit window placement. I had to simply let it pass...
Very typical JC, they never fixed the issue on their 200-scale 748s as well.Same for me and the JC KLM ATR42 (and ATR72 they showed on Instagram), just bad cockpit windows again and again even though it's one of the most important aspects of a diecast model.