NG Model 1:400 June 2025 Release Hints

If they do PSA, hopefully the pod beneath the nose is included! It's light gray and doesn't require electroplating, so it could very well be plastic. Also eager to see if the Stargazer has the rocket pylon, or even the pegasus rocket.

If it isn't that would be a massive disappointment, but you're right I guess the Stargazer needs a similar add on too so maybe you're right about it being PSA
 
Any idea when we'll get to know the releases @nb.aviation ?😅
I guess later this week...

Below is the hints they have posted on Rednote so actually a few have been added and the 777s are more specified as -ER

June Riddle
1:400

Airbus A319

B-6xxx

Airbus A320

D-Axxx

Airbus A321

HL8xxx

Airbus A350-900

B-3xxx

Boeing 747-400

B-2xxx

Boeing 777-200/ER

HL8xxx

HL7xxx

B-2xxx

Boeing 777-300/ER

B-16xxx

Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner

B-1xxx

B-2xxx

B-17xxx

Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner

A6-xxx

McDonnell Douglas MD-82

N23xxx

N96xxx

Lockheed L-1011 TriStar

N14xxx

N10xxx
 
A few more likely candidates:

N14xxx: Northrop or Orbital N140SC, maybe both.
IMG_3584.jpegIMG_3582.jpeg

N10xxx: AeroPeru N10112. N1011 (prototype) is a digit too short.
IMG_3583.jpeg

A6-xxx: Etihad A6-BMA.
IMG_3579.jpeg

N23xxx & N96xxx: Only American (among the MD-82 operators on the voting list) had these regs.
IMG_3585.jpeg

D-xxxx: Lufthansa, Eurowings, Condor in descending order of likelihood.
IMG_3589.jpegIMG_3590.jpegIMG_3586.jpegIMG_3588.jpegIMG_3587.jpeg
 
Last edited:
To be fair, RS was not the first person to throw Gemini into the discussion.

Because it is something we can point to and compare. Just like how we are using previous NG releases to compare to subsequent releases.

Bias absolutely plays a role in how we see everything. Where you were born, when you were born, where you have lived, shapes how we all see things, and what airlines and planes we are interested in collecting. Different people have different tolerances for errors or mistakes they are willing to accept, again this is based on their own experiences and biases.

Having seen the excellent work NG is capable of, is your bias of knowing they can do better.

The only way to have an impartial analysis would be to have someone who knows zero about aviation and models, put 2 models in front of them, and ask which they think looks better or more realistic. Our knowledge of aviation affects how we see things.

The nod I mentioned to GJ and AC in the comments above is simply based on that fact that NG and GJ are the two big competitors in this hobby. When I’m distinguishing why NG came onto the scene so successfully it’s important to acknowledge what made them have a competitive advantage to GJ which is not a bias but a reality of the marketplace.
 
Top