Oh, i thought he was talking about the airline logos under the plane, as both of the pics feature logos under the plane. It actually seems that the Model Company Logo has gotten smaller over time. Historically, the logo under the plane in GJ Releases was decently sized. but it has gotten smaller. (i say this as i own a GJ El Al 707)He's asking about the model company logos not the airline ones, and in which case I like it better without. The model branding can be done on the packaging and I'd say that's sufficient.
This is what I was meaningHe's asking about the model company logos not the airline ones, and in which case I like it better without. The model branding can be done on the packaging and I'd say that's sufficient.
My gemini 777s logo on the bottom is barely noticeable but it would be useful to show people who arent in the hobby what a gemini jet isOh, i thought he was talking about the airline logos under the plane, as both of the pics feature logos under the plane. It actually seems that the Model Company Logo has gotten smaller over time. Historically, the logo under the plane in GJ Releases was decently sized. but it has gotten smaller. (i say this as i own a GJ El Al 707)
When a model is "as real as it gets" there's ZERO room for having a manufacturer branding on it.
Let's be serious Jorge.I like them, I think it's a charming tradition. But, yes, it does get in the way when the model also has relevant elements of the livery on the belly.
But these are airplane models. Gemini's slogan refers to the high amount of precise detailing these models have, but they are all scale replicas at the end of the day. If one is to take that statement so literally then I'd argue that the windows are completely wrong, as they look like painted grey squares don't the fuselage, when in reality they are clear.
Let's be serious Jorge.
There's a BIG difference between the technical feasibility of certain details and totally superfluos detailings like having the makers logo on the model.