And 747-400 and classics as well depending on which factory it comes out of. Some look perfect and some look like they belong in thrash cans.Oh god, I thought that was exclusive to their 1:200 748s. JC gonna JC, I guess...
Is it me or is the forehead area on the Korean simply too small? Or not steep enough? I'm pretty sure it's not just the printing that's wrong.
The JC 748 has a poorly-shaped forehead, it's too smooth. Another big-ish issue is the tail. Okay mould, not great.Yeah, looks poorly shaped indeed!
The nosegear is another issue yes. JC tends to have that flaw across the board.Cannot agree more. I bought a JCW 747 following the hype lately and only found instant regret -- completely honest opinion.
My biggest problem is that the landing gear rod is too thick, especially on the front gear, this takes all the elegance away instantly.
The second issue is that the front landing gear is too short, making it like an A332.
The cockpit printing on mine was good but it is too large, much like 1:300 cockpit being put on a 1:400 model.
I'm now back at buying PH 747s and will leave JC alone unless these issues are fixed. Maybe its nose is not pointy enough, but it is much more bearable to me and shows off the elegance of the queen very nicely.
The one I bought.
View attachment 20189
I think the unit you own is made in the old cradle casting from GJ hence the thick gear leg? I have plenty JC 744s in the newer slot-in casting and their nose gear are much more intricate than those in the GJ castings.The one I bought.
View attachment 20189
Thanks for sharing that, that indeed looks better, I guess I will give the new mould a tryI think the unit you own is made in the old cradle casting from GJ hence the thick gear leg? I have plenty JC 744s in the newer slot-in casting and their nose gear are much more intricate than those in the GJ castings.
JC slot-in 744
View attachment 20224
GJ cradle 744View attachment 20225