planes_on_a_shelf
Well-known member
Bro, why does this irk you so much, I really don't understand. If anything, this is a hobby with a broad spectrum of spaces of interest, and everyone has their own areas of expertise, curiosity and inquiry to pursue - so no one is forced to explain to you, or to anyone else for that matter, why they're here, or whether they have an Acre Ridge Collectors Club pedigree, especially when they have valid points to make, and from which, as a community, we enrich our understanding and exchange knowledge about aspects of the hobby.Dude, it's not that deep. All I'm saying is that Phantom does not collect Aeroclassics (he doesn't, what do you want me to do about it?) Yet he is suddenly interested in Aeroclassics production practices. Hence, this is purely a recreational discussion as ultimately it doesn't really matter to him what Aeroclassics does since he is not interested in getting any of their models anyway. The same discussion is going on with @Madridista at DAC. Same thing applies.
This is exactly the kind of gatekeeping that I'm presuming you're unknowingly engaging with. How many models you purchase, or what you purchase, or not, is not a criteria at all for participation and exchange. Just because someone may or may not purchase certain models, does not invalidate their participation and relevance of commentary or critique.
You seem to be personally attacked by @Madridista or @Phantom when they make relevant points or state thought-provoking facts - which seem to somehow ruffle you -and I seriously request you to introspect on this Buddy.
They have as much right to comment, as you do. In fact if anything, you clearly attack their right to comment itself, or their right as valid community participants - instead of refuting or debating what they have to say on objective or logical grounds.
Ain't healthy buddy.
Last edited: