Arcturus
New member
Despite the conventional wisdom that people should generally enjoy the hobby itself, rather than let a few minor details get the best of them, I somewhat agree that a model definitely has a much more premium feel to it when utilizing specific materials as apart of their overall product. My go-to motto for model collecting is that the closer a model resembles the actual in-real-life aircraft, all the better — that could be mimicking the rubber wheels from a 1:1 aircraft (instead of plastic tires for the landing gears), to resembling similar metal/aluminum alloy from the 1:1 using die-cast metal, to stabilizers deriving from similar material, etc., all of which are used in similar tone for a 1:400 or 1:200 with some selective models out there. It is obviously not the same exact material used from an actual plane, no doubt. This is also acknowledging that composite materials are more increasingly common, but it gets the general point across. Hence, 1:200s are great in that aspect with the amount of increased detailing and much more precision + premium feel you get for the price you pay — understandably it comes at a common cost of space and budgeting. If such advocates welcome all levels of criticism (from the tiniest to the largest critics), then so be it - no one is holding you back. Just be weary of potentially injecting personal bias as that should be strayed away upon (quite a few examples in the past I’ve seen here before), as well as keeping it as respectful as possible. My two cents — as aforementioned before, we are all in this hobby to enjoy it together; let’s stray away from such hostility and unnecessarily jabbing at others on here. 