NG Model 1:400 September 2025 Release Hints

2 Cargos in different title variations
2 777-200 (first CN 777 + 1 more reg)
3 777-200ER (2 & 1 unusual 'named' airframe)

I don't think there's an 'squandering' BS etc etc LOL
Discounting the freighters, FIVE variations with very minor differences between them is redundant lol. -200ERs are indistinguishable from -200s, and they’re all in the same livery.

Of course it wouldn’t feel that way since they’re in your criteria, I’d have zero complaints if they’d been 7 Singapores.
 
Will pass on the CZ 777s this time. The passenger windows are printed too high per usual which also makes the cheatline curve down at the nose. Whereas it should be level especially when looking at it from the front.
Piggybacking off my original post about NGs continuous passenger window height issue. The first picture shows the JC release, the second shows the NG, and the third is the real thing.

As you can see, the fact that the passenger windows are too high is extremely noticeable here, and made even more noticeable by the slope of the cheatline at the nose. The passenger windows NEED to be lowered. But they have not made any adjustments to this.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9481.jpeg
    IMG_9481.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 56
  • IMG_9482.jpeg
    IMG_9482.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 38
  • IMG_9483.jpeg
    IMG_9483.jpeg
    5.8 MB · Views: 63
Piggybacking off my original post about NGs continuous passenger window height issue. The first picture shows the JC release, the second shows the NG, and the third is the real thing.

As you can see, the fact that the passenger windows are too high is extremely noticeable here, and made even more noticeable by the slope of the cheatline at the nose. The passenger windows NEED to be lowered. But they have not made any adjustments to this.
The cockpit window should also be lowered (not as much as the passenger ones). On this model, it even seems like all printings should have been lowered (not only the windows, but also the painting)
 
The cockpit window should also be lowered (not as much as the passenger ones). On this model, it even seems like all printings should have been lowered (not only the windows, but also the painting)
I agree. The bottom blue portion of the cheatline really highlights that; where it sits relative to the wing. The bottom gold stripe should be the same alignment with the top of the wing.
 
Looks like JC has the same error (images below) albeit the gear truck gap is a wee bit tighter - wondering why it's never been pointed out for so long on the JC mould
The doors should slant down towards the mid-section as illustrated in the photo of the actual above - shared by @Aircrafter93
1759949807422-01.jpeg
1759949836587-01.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Yeah I think you guys are making mountains out of molehills here. If the spacing of maingear doors is a problem for you then you're stretching!
Not stretching as much as the main gear doors on these models! 😂

It is very noticeable on the NG 747, that’s no mountain out of a mole hill. It’s plain as day, and the first thing I noticed swiping through the photos on instagram, that and the lack of the fuel release nozzle on the wings.
 
Last edited:
Top