swagninja84
Well-known member
So, is there now a difference between Ultimate and luxury package? Or is that the same thing, and they suck and labelingIt's for the stand and luxury package
So, is there now a difference between Ultimate and luxury package? Or is that the same thing, and they suck and labelingIt's for the stand and luxury package
Boggles my mind they’ve still haven’t done, and will never do, one in the regular old livery.
By making measurements, I found the sweep of phoenix A346/5 wings is about 35 degrees; instead it should be around 30 degrees which is a the same as the A343/2 and A330 family. This is definitely stopping me to buy more releases using this loud. The issue is unacceptable to me as 5 degrees is such a large difference in wing design. Just imagine buying a MiG15 model but fitted with a mig17 wings Lmao.Unfortunately the Phoenix mould is not without it's issues: the cockpit windows are a bit too large, but an even bigger issue is the shape of the cockpit area is too wide. Additionally, the wings on the A340-600 & 500 moulds are swept too far back.
If HX Models can fix the cockpit print (too large as well), nose shape (slightly too blunt) and nosegear height, it will be a worthy successor for the Phoenix A340-500/600 mould. The wing sweep angle is already miles above Phoenix's rendition.
UPDATE:
After receiving my HX models Etihad Airways A340-600, I the cockpit window printing is not too large (maybe slightly, it's still more accurate than the too-small NG / Panda A330/A340 cockpit printing and similar in size to the Phoenix & JC A330/340 printing). The nose gear isn't too short either; the wheel is too large, giving the impression it is too short. The only major issue is the shape of the nose: it is too blunt.
Of course the wing area should be larger than the A330 and A343; but the sweep needs to be the sameBy making measurements, I found the sweep of phoenix A346/5 wings is about 35 degrees; instead it should be around 30 degrees which is a the same as the A343/2 and A330 family. This is definitely stopping me to buy more releases using this loud. The issue is unacceptable to me as 5 degrees is such a large difference in wing design. Just imagine buying a MiG15 model but fitted with a mig17 wings Lmao.
Yeah for some time nowLooks like we have another MU 738 B-1791, second edition (China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 crash aircraft)
View attachment 51479
Didn't expect them to approve this, as it's pretty sensitive in China. Very sad it crashed thoughLooks like we have another MU 738 B-1791, second edition (China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 crash aircraft)
View attachment 51479
The Tristars and the A321neo are on there as well. All the EVA Air's are on there.I understand there's demand, but........?!!
Though I have a theory....... Recently, CX a350s have NEVER appeared on the official NG website before, and the only 777 to make an appearance is B-HNK (and the fantasy one - so not considered) - obviously due to licensing (?) - so has something changed with the licensing...?
And maybe the same with the EVA?
View attachment 51515
View attachment 51516
View attachment 51517
View attachment 51518
Yeah hence I mentioned 'recently' - wrt the current scheme - also the Tristars wear the old scheme (not protected by current law, due to their being under another regime, perhaps?). The A321 is from the nascent days of NG when they weren't a big player (that's the HYJL mould btw)The Tristars and the A321neo are on there as well. All the EVA Air's are on there.
If they give us an A350-1000 without the nose sensors finally, I have to get it to replace my current copy.I understand there's demand, but........?!!
Though I have a theory....... Recently, CX a350s have NEVER appeared on the official NG website before, and the only 777 to make an appearance is B-HNK (and the fantasy one - so not considered) - obviously due to licensing (?) - so has something changed with the licensing...?
And maybe the same with the EVA?
View attachment 51515
View attachment 51516
View attachment 51517
View attachment 51518
I expect NG to make the full CX A350 fleet by end of next yearI understand there's demand, but........?!!
Though I have a theory....... Recently, CX a350s have NEVER appeared on the official NG website before, and the only 777 to make an appearance is B-HNK (and the fantasy one - so not considered) - obviously due to licensing (?) - so has something changed with the licensing...?
And maybe the same with the EVA?
View attachment 51515
View attachment 51516
View attachment 51517
The bigger question is, will they screw up the CX cheatline color again?I understand there's demand, but........?!!
Though I have a theory....... Recently, CX a350s have NEVER appeared on the official NG website before, and the only 777 to make an appearance is B-HNK (and the fantasy one - so not considered) - obviously due to licensing (?) - so has something changed with the licensing...?
And maybe the same with the EVA?
View attachment 51515
View attachment 51516
View attachment 51517
View attachment 51518
Most definitely lolThe bigger question is, will they screw up the CX cheatline color again?
Finally announced. I remember this was one of the earliest approvedChina Airlines (B-18918, Carbon Fiber livery)
View attachment 52008
Yes, but my biggest suspicion is that NG saw that AeroPolaris launched the B-18918 and decided to follow suit and launch the same product???Finally announced. I remember this was one of the earliest approved
That may have happened - my thoughts too. NG's drivers are asleep at the wheel.Yes, but my biggest suspicion is that NG saw that AeroPolaris launched the B-18918 and decided to follow suit and launch the same product???![]()