Airline News

[qweyrhgf]

(still can't get over them not ordering the A330neo though)

View attachment 56923

There is no other way. After all, the apron at Songshan Airport (TSA) can only accommodate aircraft with a wingspan of 60 meters or less. If CI wants to replace the A333 and keep the three routes to Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul, it can only choose the 787.

 

[planes_on_a_shelf]

There is no other way. After all, the apron at Songshan Airport (TSA) can only accommodate aircraft with a wingspan of 60 meters or less. If CI wants to replace the A333 and keep the three routes to Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul, it can only choose the 787.

Don't A330neos fly to these 3 cities already?

 

[LeoMuse747]

That livery just looks lovely on any airframe.
(still can't get over them not ordering the A330neo though)
Looking forward to NG making this

View attachment 56923

and I'm glad China Airlines is still keeping this wonderful scheme after so many years.
They have slightly changed the typeface but it was a nice improvement, in my opinion.

 

[qweyrhgf]

Don't A330neos fly to these 3 cities already?

There is no problem with these three airports. The main problem is that Taiwan Songshan Airport (TSA, it is also one of the most important airports in CI)apron can only accommodate aircraft with a wingspan of 60 meters or less. It cannot use A330Neo, A350

 

[planes_on_a_shelf]

There is no problem with these three airports. The main problem is that Taiwan Songshan Airport (TSA, it is also one of the most important airports in CI)apron can only accommodate aircraft with a wingspan of 60 meters or less. It cannot use A330Neo, A350

Oh okay
CI don't operate regional / Asia flights out of Taoyuan?

EDIT: they don't - just checking

(also checking - 77W & A339 have same wingspan)

 

[planes_on_a_shelf]

and I'm glad China Airlines is still keeping this wonderful scheme after so many years.
They have slightly changed the typeface but it was a nice improvement, in my opinion.

Yes. Such a pleasant and unique scheme!