Updated Phoenix Airbus A300 Mould First Photos

[YesterAirlines]

Phoenix have been working on a major update to their Airbus A300 mould fixing the major nose and engine issues it previously had. It is nearly ready and they have provided me with the first photos of the updates:

Airbus A300 Update by Phoenix

A first look at the new updated Airbus A300 in 400 scale by Phoenix

www.yesterdaysairlines.com

 

[pons399]

There it is. Super hyped for the first release.

 

[CPHL1011]

THANK YOU, for mentioning the Conair!!

Have flown on this once and it has been my biggest wish to be made in 1:400 along with the Sterling 757

Looks promissing with the new mould

 

[qweyrhgf]

just want to ask, is YU better, or the new PH mold?

 

[JET-10/11/47]

Looks good so far!

 

[LeoMuse747]

Looks super good! However, isn't the vertical stabilizer a bit too thin?
Other than that... looks fantastic.

After the A300, can Phoenix please develop a new mould for the 747? Please please please?

 

[YesterAirlines]

just want to ask, is YU better, or the new PH mold?

I think that remains to be seen. the YU was good, but not without issues - the nosegear height being the most annoying. This Phoenix version has the potential to be its equal and is likely to get more usage I'd have thought.

 

[planes_on_a_shelf]

Cue more wavy wing mama buses from AC

 

[abdulmohiuddin]

Wonderful news, I look forward to seeing some more A300's with modern printing. Curious to see how it competes with the Yu A300 we just got.

 

[keji833]

I think this is superior to Yu in at least one huge aspect: main gear size!!! Yu's main gear size and gap looks like L-1011's.


So many options for A300, just a couple jumping to my mind:

 

[Phantom]

Taking the vertical tail unchanged from the original mould is a most unfortunate decision. It was (and is) a mile and a half off.

No time right now, but this real quick overlay should say more than words:


Not happy with that wing profile either.

 

[Mark22]

Would be a great one too

 

[Redpanda747]

Are my eyes tricking me or is this classic B2/B4 mould using the deeper/rounded rear fuselage of the later -600 series? Instead of the more straight taper the classic had?

 

[LeoMuse747]

Taking the vertical tail unchanged from the original mould is a most unfortunate decision. It was (and is) a mile and a half off.

No time right now, but this real quick overlay should say more than words:
View attachment 68757

Not happy with that wing profile either.

I'm glad I wasn't the only one!
@DTcustoms please let them know