Detailed Mould Comparison - Boeing 767-200

YesterAirlines

Moderator
Staff member
There's suddenly a lot more competition for the humble 767-200 in 2025, with 2 new moulds in the past few years and the Aeroclassics mould still in quite heavy usage. The old Dragon mould dates all the way back from 2000 but remains a decent model, so how far have the new moulds come and how do they compare to the older versions? Here's a detailed comparison to investigate:


B762_DMC_HEADER.jpg
 
There's suddenly a lot more competition for the humble 767-200 in 2025, with 2 new moulds in the past few years and the Aeroclassics mould still in quite heavy usage. The old Dragon mould dates all the way back from 2000 but remains a decent model, so how far have the new moulds come and how do they compare to the older versions? Here's a detailed comparison to investigate:


View attachment 59808

Panda slays the competition :cool: so nice to see good old Dragon still being featured in these reviews, and surprisingly scoring well when compared to much newer moulds. AC 767-200 is really crappy in my opinion, it does look poor to me and I avoid it.
NG looks good but Panda just looks so much better.
 
I bought a Britannia B762 sometime back and the mould was JC. It was faultless and to date one of my favourite models. I hope we can see more like this in the very near future!
 
My personal favourite is the Dragon mould. I only have the Dragon and old Gemini moulds. However, that might change if NG or Panda ever decide to release some Ansett or Qantas 767-200s
 
Top