I appreciate that HX improve their moulds gradually BUT why can't they get them correct first time around? Why did they release this one if after a few runs they can see it isn't correct. It isn't the first time they've done this too.
Again it isn't a 'bad' mould but it is inferior to at least 3 competitors who didn't need to constantly massage their 737 mould. As a collector, and a reviewer, I don't want to be buying brand's test products. I appreciate that HX are cheaper to buy but if they want to be compared to other brands, and they do, then they need to get their products correct.
Maybe it’s not proper to call it a “test” mould
Because they really have done all the procedures before the official release.
Every product has problems on first release… In my opinion it’s not a question of “right” or “wrong”; it’s a matter of degree. You can say it is a 737 rather than an Airbus after all… In this case there is no exact right or wrong, unless HX painted green rather than blue on the Korean 737.
PM’s 767 also has problems, NG’s 737 also has problems— but less noticeable.
Well if that Korean is all what they could do, I wouldn’t be so annoyed. What really annoyed me was “could have done better”.
In other words, they may be too reliant on customers’ advice. They need to learn more on how to find where to improve.
It’s comprehensible that they want to improve their product step by step, but if the first version is too…, how could they gain enough feedbacks from the customers? What if we customers feel worried about their proficiency?
Once again I really hope it’s their last time doing things like this.
Maybe I’m always too strict, but I surely believe they have the ability to make it pretty, accurate and detailed.
