It's certainly a curious choice. No way any Pan Am 747 was ever that cleanEngine electroplating’s waayyy too shiny, (literally) hurts to look at.
Yeah, a more “smoky” finish like this would’ve been better.
View attachment 46259
Hopefully their next releases will be corrected.
Curiously the TWAs don't have the bling?
@Jim can confirm
I'll then be picking those up
This first PA batch is just too plasticky shiny
And certainly pronounces the odd shape of HX's engines and pylons.Engine electroplating’s waayyy too shiny, (literally) hurts to look at.
This exactly. I'd be ok with some bling if these engines/pylons would at least resemble the shapes of the real thing.my concern is that in 1:400, the engines especially become too blingy - and the model then looks toy like - which kills any realism.
No, but they'd be good to do them like on the 747 prototype.Same mistake as JA8101?
Jokes on all of us... BigBird from 20 years ago chose to do it with the smaller roll-out globe. (Image courtesy https://www.wingsworld.cn)No, but they'd be good to do them like on the 747 prototype.
Was there a reason for painting N747PA not the way it was initially rolled out? (smaller globe)
This would be something for those HX engines. A fine coat of satin clear (90-95% gloss or so) applied over the chrome would work wonders I think.Still waiting for the lost art of Dragon Wings/Jet-X two-tone Chrome to make a comeback... (images courtesy of https://pps.main.jp). I believe this was achieved with electroplating/chroming, then applying a thin layer of matte/semi-matte clear coat to resemble the variations in the natural aluminum finish on natural metal planes. This look was also used on several American Airlines models (777s and MD-11s)... all of which were released more than two decades ago!
Engine electroplating’s waayyy too shiny, (literally) hurts to look at.