HX Models - News & Discussion

I'd like HK to do some liveries which haven't been done yet. Such as these below:




 
I'd like HK to do some liveries which haven't been done yet. Such as these below:




The sister ship to the Kallita wsd made by JC only offense is the Reg and it was on the new mould too
 
I'd like HK to do some liveries which haven't been done yet. Such as these below:





an Atlas Air VIP 747-400 has never been done before!! i’d love to have one.
 
Curious to know the difference between the HX and Panda MD-11.
This was my post earlier in this thread regarding the HX MD-11 vs Panda. There are aspects of HX that I would argue are better, i.e. engine and pylon detailing. I do think that the Panda winglet shape is more accurate. Both are superb.
----
I do really like the HX MD-11 tooling. They have done a much better job at the cockpit window size. The first few releases (Shanghai Cargo and China Airlines had too large of windows). The detailing on the engines is also top notch, better than Panda I would argue, especially the pylon detailing. I do like the landing gear and winglet shape more on the Panda tooling. This HX tooling is almost certainly a clone of the JC 200 version, with the upward angle of the winglet. But HX really has something special with the flaps down versions. I will be getting any MD-11 HX releases at this rate. There are so many awesome airlines to do, and Panda does not pump out enough releases to satiate my MD-11 cravings.
 
This was my post earlier in this thread regarding the HX MD-11 vs Panda. There are aspects of HX that I would argue are better, i.e. engine and pylon detailing. I do think that the Panda winglet shape is more accurate. Both are superb.
----
I do really like the HX MD-11 tooling. They have done a much better job at the cockpit window size. The first few releases (Shanghai Cargo and China Airlines had too large of windows). The detailing on the engines is also top notch, better than Panda I would argue, especially the pylon detailing. I do like the landing gear and winglet shape more on the Panda tooling. This HX tooling is almost certainly a clone of the JC 200 version, with the upward angle of the winglet. But HX really has something special with the flaps down versions. I will be getting any MD-11 HX releases at this rate. There are so many awesome airlines to do, and Panda does not pump out enough releases to satiate my MD-11 cravings.

If the HX is a worthy rival than I would agree that it would be wise to jump on which ever one comes out with the desired subject matter first. I did purchase the Panda Delta widget and AA versions from last year but it's crazy we have seen nothing since. Thank you I will be looking out for HX then as well.
 
If the HX is a worthy rival than I would agree that it would be wise to jump on which ever one comes out with the desired subject matter first. I did purchase the Panda Delta widget and AA versions from last year but it's crazy we have seen nothing since. Thank you I will be looking out for HX then as well.
Exactly my thoughts. The HX and Panda I would argue are on par with each other. The Panda mould has things about it that are better than HX, and vice versa. The HX MD-11 is a very worthy addition to the scale, and it does seem that over time, it has gotten better. Not to mention the number of unique releases thus far. The Panda MD-11 will fall into oblivion if not properly used I fear...
 
Top