Battlecry
Member
The forgotten Panda Model mould is virtually identical, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's the same mould NG used.Yep
Aviation400 New announcements
- Thread starter 1.400_modelaviation
- Start date
1.400_modelaviation
Member
Last edited:
JJ Skippy
Well-known member
Okay that Alaska looks even more beautiful than I thought.
1.400_modelaviation
Member
I was thinking this, winglets definitely look very similar to NG’s
Battlecry
Member
The cockpit shape still looks the same, unfortunately.
I expect the Alaska to be a good one - I have several other AV400 787s that I'm very happy with
These look awesome. The Qatar 777 is stunning!!!
danwashere
Active member
This looks like AI
Clyde Puffer Pacific 3182
Member
is it just me, or does the cockpit look off for the Alaska, it could just be the image quality but something looks off to me
1.400_modelaviation
Member
Possibly. They were sent to me on instagram. They look good for AI if they are
These are 100% AI sadly. The 787 and 777 don't even look like the AV400 moulds and it is my understanding that these models aren't even completed yet.
If you look on the AirSpotters website it even says they are AI generated: https://www.airspotters.com/aviation-200/
Very misleading and not good practice in my opinion. It doesn't give a real representation of the actual model and gives a false view of when it s likely to be ready as well.
If you look on the AirSpotters website it even says they are AI generated: https://www.airspotters.com/aviation-200/
Very misleading and not good practice in my opinion. It doesn't give a real representation of the actual model and gives a false view of when it s likely to be ready as well.
1.400_modelaviation
Member
Ahh shame! Whoever posted them on a group on instagram has cropped out the AI markings from air spotters. Sorry all
Oh wow... I was completely fooled by AI this time 
those videos of cats cooking meals in the kitchen are easier to debunk 
those videos of cats cooking meals in the kitchen are easier to debunk
1.400_modelaviation
Member
Totally agree but the issue stems from retailers/brands so not much we can do unfortunately. Regulation really needs to catch up. These were by far the best AI renders I’ve seen yet…
Battlecry
Member
Definitely. All images and video should be required to disclose they are AI-generated by law through a visible watermark and embedded metadata.
Many of us rely on pictures of the actual models to determine if we want to purchase them or not, to get an idea of colors, mould accuracy, print accuracy, etc.
I ordered them based on those pics thinking they would be ready and my money wouldn't be sitting with the dealer for months. Also, there is an available model in the order. Now I won't get that either.
I have a number of models tied up with the dealer as they are ordered with NJ, JC or A400 models that aren't available for months (or years).
I've asked the dealer can they send the ones that they have but they never respond (myhobbyhouse).
I have a number of models tied up with the dealer as they are ordered with NJ, JC or A400 models that aren't available for months (or years).
I've asked the dealer can they send the ones that they have but they never respond (myhobbyhouse).
Similar threads
