Recent content by Phantom

Nobody saw anything?😅 So here's the rest of my SQ 747-100. Thanks to aviationmegastore.com for the great service!

ChairFlyer101 mentioned the band on the fuselage and I added that it's the wrong color as per the picture (as in not matching the nacelles). I see this is the case on all new colors Cathays done by NG. Wonder why nobody ever mentioned it. Unless I missed it of course.

I don't see this. They seem to adjust saturation, contrast and highlights/shadows but that happens on the entire picture. Altering certain areas would happen on purpose. My NG Cathay 351 shows the same issue btw.

Yes, it's there, but the wrong (grey?) color is even more obvious in this pic. But wait... I see that's a general problem with NG's entire Cathay range.

...and it's not even a light blue. Like I said earlier, someone (important) seems to be missing from NG's production facillity.

If someone has a caliper at hand... A correct A350's v.tail is 23.55mm high at trailing edge. A359's total height is 42.85-43.68mm pending on load and CG. The AeroPolaris tail looks slightly off in shape.

Zhukovsky certainly has some interesting airframes.

I was talking about NG obviousely.

They first appeared more than a year ago and more than half a year before cn720 entered the assembly line. Like I said earlier, they might just have both toolings in use and have nobody coordinating their proper use. Or maybe this photosoot model is just a one off which I highly doubt

You mean they reserved some "old wing" castings for this yet to be built new airframe?

Long before the real thing was unveiled?

Like I said, that's the "old" wing on this 100th. But I'm more worried about the crooked printed flags on the 80s.

They have both but maybe no clue what they do.

Is it just me or does the fuselage look so "777-10"?