I'd appreciate if you'd show some side by side comparisons of both. I've been asked a few times but only have V2. Would be nice to see them side by side.
If anyone's willing to, place a good mould 767 (Panda or NG) nose to nose with some 777 models and compare. The section 41 (nose/cockpit) should be identical if the 777 is as good as the 767 - granted the latter is.
Or even better, take a cockpit decal that fits nicely to the Panda 767 and apply...
A "wrong" artwork looks bad on a "correct" mould as much as a correct artwork looks bad on an erroneous mould.
Here the oversized (too wide) cockpit artwork still doesn't look wide enough for the mould which speaks volumes.
The APU section just adds to this. Those two now prominently moulded...
This just shows how they are stuck with this licensing stuff.
While the unlicensed others start production as soon as pics are available, the one who has licensing agreements sure looses big time in communicating and approval and will be last to market.
Now if these 25+ years would be worth...
Yes, however it's not that much the detail, more the accuracy to the eye for me.
So it's NG/Panda on one hand and an interest for 1950's to 80's on the other.
A rather cheap intersection of sets.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.