Indeed but checking artwork and then getting the Chinese workers to make corrections is another thing! Some things just don't get done! ( bangs head on wall!)
Thanks to my input that BOAC 747 would have been full of errors! At last we finally got the font correct! Hard to check everything from artwork based on a poor photo though!
I was involved in the research for the Navy C-54 to ensure Aeroclassics used fluorescent orange paint and not 'plain orange'. It looks really great with the correct colour.
Thankfully I've got the Aeroclassics version which is better. The Yu-Model looks good apart from the nose, where the cheatline comes to apoint, it should be lower so as not to distort the cockpit windows and the black nose radome should not be 'raked' like that.
I am having a cull on my US retros and selling them to make space for new releases. No lists yet, but if you after are Aeroclassics, pm me with your wants and you can have first priority?
The best way to reach a good price on E. Bay is to list the model at the price you paid for it. Let the market decide if it's worth more to them, but at least with only one bid you will get your money back and collectors didn't think it was worth more! Many people have the perception that they...
I have to ask myself, do I really need another 747-400 as all the airline liveries I am interested in have been made by other manufacturers on quite satisfactory moulds?
If it's PH-, then we still need more prop classics on the DC-6 and DC-7 moulds. KLM in the 1960s 'diagonal stripe' tail scheme still missing. Also Transavia and Martins Air Charter. A Martinair DC-9 and Fokker F.28 also still not made by AC.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.